I really like Carolina and the under but I dont like them together so here you go. See the blog for my reasons. A hit here takes us over 65% for the week Carolina- 1 unit LOSS »
Archive for September, 2009
MNF Tidbits Week 3
A few trends to ponder (not all of my data work.. some extracted capper blogs) - Carolina is 3-7 ATS in their last 10 games. - The Panthers are 17-1 ATS as a non-divisional underdog vs. an opponent that allowed 28+ points in their last game. - Carolina is 8-2 ATS as a non-divisional... »
NFL Week 3 Free Picks Late Games
Buffalo (+6)- 1 unit LOSS Cincy (+4) – 1 unit WINNER Cincy/Pitt Over (37)- 1 unit WINNER Chicago (-2.5)-1 unit WINNER Denver/Oakland Over (37) – 1 unit LOSS »
Free Picks NFL Week 3 Early Games
Detroit (+7) 1 unit WINNER Detroit /Washington Over (38.5)- 1 Unit LOSS Green Bay/STL Over (41)- 1 unit WINNER New England (-4)- 1 unit WINNER Minnesota (-7)- 1 unit LOSS »
The season is off to a blistering start
After two weeks of the NFL season I have played the numbers the way they should be played to a negative outcome. For some players it may be time to pack it up but not this year. The seasons trends are starting to develop and the time is right for picking winners. I WILL... »
Stay Tuned
A recap of the first two weeks along with a ferw trends will be posted this week. The year has started a little slow but I am still comiitted to the 75% hit rate that I promise to all of those in Picksley Nation. Good data is forming and usually the next few weeks... »
Peyton is the king of the under
Although betting an under is against all that is good in sports (actually cheering for no action), betting the colts under is always a solid play. Historically, Peyton goes over when he is against the wall, not when they are a favorite. You might find some interesting trends in the data if you play... »
Late Games September 20, 2009
Denver/Cleveland over (38.5) 1 unit LOSS Pittsburgh/Chicago over (38.5) 1 unit LOSS Seattle/San Fran over (39) 1 unit LOSS »
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |